qerthook.blogg.se

Difference in cost sequential testing nt
Difference in cost sequential testing nt












difference in cost sequential testing nt

Physiological changes at high altitude are known to affect BNP values. Diagnostic certainty can be obtained if echocardiogram shows reduced ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction or right-sided heart disease. When It is suspected, it can be ruled out if BNP values are below 100 pg/ml. Heart failure (HF) is growing in importance as a significant cause of disease and mortality.

difference in cost sequential testing nt

The use of NT-proBNP as a screening test could substantially reduce the number of echocardiographies in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected cardiac failure, as well as the associated costs. This corresponded to a yearly cost reduction of approximately €2–5 million per million inhabitants in these counties. The estimated costs for NT-proBNP tests and echocardiographies per county were reduced by 33%–36% with the 400 pg/mL cut-off and by 28%–29% with the 300 pg/mL cut-off. The cost-effectiveness of the testing strategy was estimated through the short-term cost avoidance and reduction in demand for echocardiographies. Two cut-off levels of NT-proBNP were used: 400 and 300 pg/mL. The costs were calculated from three Swedish counties: Blekinge, Östergötland, and Uppland. Retrospective study in a third-party payer perspective. To estimate the possible economic benefit of a sequential testing strategy with NT-proBNP to reduce the number of echocardiographies.














Difference in cost sequential testing nt